logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Womack" <mwom...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [COMPATIBILITY] DOMConfigurator
Date Tue, 03 Jan 2006 04:55:43 GMT
Yeah, the configureAndWatch methods would be added back for 
PropertyConfigurator too.

OK, I'll add those back in tomorrow.  Coming up with the test cases will 
take the time.

And we should start a document of the "expected differences" and pass that 
on the user list with each release.

-Mark

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Curt Arnold" <carnold@apache.org>
To: "Log4J Developers List" <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: [COMPATIBILITY] DOMConfigurator


>
> On Jan 2, 2006, at 8:07 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
>
>> I'd be ok with this being one of the binary compatibility  breakages.  I 
>> don't believe there would be too many people that had  extended from 
>> DOMConfigurator.
>>
>
> I'm okay with it too, at least for this iteration.  I assume that  we'd 
> both like the configureAndWatch methods added back to  DOMConfigurator and 
> PropertyConfigurator.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message