logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Endre StĂžlsvik <En...@Stolsvik.com>
Subject RE: log4j 1.3 minimum JDK (was Re: [VOTE] Release log4j 1.2.12rc3)
Date Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:19:41 GMT
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Mark Womack wrote:

| But is there some specific reason why we want to upgrade and be compatible
| with only >= JDK 1.3?  Is there some core class we really need to use in
| order to make log4j better?  If not, then I don't see a compelling reason to
| self-limit ourselves to >= JDK 1.3.  We are a logging framework, it just
| makes more sense to be as compatible as we can be, imo.  It is one of the
| pluses for log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging.

I wholeheartedly agree. Dropping 1.2 support "just because it's old" is 
very silly - there must be some -reason- behind that choice.

Regards,
Endre

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message