logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yoav Shapira" <yoa...@MIT.EDU>
Subject RE: log4j 1.3 minimum JDK (was Re: [VOTE] Release log4j 1.2.12rc3)
Date Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:41:24 GMT
Hola,
+1 on JDK 1.3.  It's more than five years old now.  If someone hasn't
updated their JVM in 5 years, they're not going to update log4j from 1.2...

Yoav Shapira
System Design and Management Fellow
MIT Sloan School of Management
Cambridge, MA USA
yoavs@computer.org / www.yoavshapira.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curt Arnold [mailto:carnold@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 9:32 PM
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: log4j 1.3 minimum JDK (was Re: [VOTE] Release log4j 1.2.12rc3)
> 
> 
> On Aug 15, 2005, at 8:23 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> 
> > This does beg the question that one of the original design goals of
> > log4j 1.3 was that it's minimum requirement would be JDK 1.2.  Are
> > we still all in favour of that?  I would like to think that JDK 1.3
> > would be an acceptable minimum in this day and age?
> 
> I think we need to break that off into another thread to not confuse
> the issue.  I could be persuaded.  We'd also should specify whether
> we target J2ME or some other subset.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message