Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-logging-log4j-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86154 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2005 19:01:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Feb 2005 19:01:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 70484 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2005 19:01:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-logging-log4j-dev-archive@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 70454 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2005 19:01:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Log4J Developers List" Reply-To: "Log4J Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list log4j-dev@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 70440 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2005 19:01:53 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from gulcu002.worldcom.ch (HELO mail.qos.ch) (212.74.184.210) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:01:52 -0800 Received: from kal.qos.ch (kal [192.168.1.3]) by mail.qos.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8AA1EC077 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:12:24 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.0.20050228195126.03c31d50@mail.qos.ch> X-Sender: ceki@mail.qos.ch (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:03:22 +0100 To: "Log4J Developers List" From: Ceki =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FClc=FC?= Subject: RE: [VOTE] Additions to the Appender interface In-Reply-To: <200502281837.j1SIbT0Z017827@outgoing.mit.edu> References: <608a7ea3bdc485fc26a88e4f9d64c5f8@apache.org> <200502281837.j1SIbT0Z017827@outgoing.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Yoav, http://cvs.apache.org is currently down so the information contained in CVS= =20 notification messages is the best we currently have. The changes in question are contained in the CVS notification message [1].= =20 Of particular interest are the changes between revision 1.17 and 1.16 in=20 the Appender interface and the changes between revision 1.35 and 1.36 in=20 AppenderSkeleton.java. A subsequent commit message [1] which includes=20 associated test cases may also be of interest. [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dlog4j-dev&m=3D110874743313972&w=3D2 [2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dlog4j-dev&m=3D110875656008077&w=3D2 At 07:37 PM 2/28/2005, Yoav Shapira wrote: >Hi, >Can we have a complete list of the changes being voted upon please? I'd >like to see it in one place before I vote. I'd also like to make sure >alternatives are explored, although they probably have been already. For >example, have an AppenderActivity interface with isClosed/isActive, and= have >AppenderSkeleton implement both Appender and AppenderActivity, rather than >add these methods to the Appender interface itself. > >No class or interface is completely untouchable. But modifications to core >pieces should have great and significant benefits to offset the cost needed >in user effort. > >Yoav --=20 Ceki G=FClc=FC The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org