logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yoav Shapira <yo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [POLL] Component and ComponentBase
Date Mon, 03 Jan 2005 17:49:59 GMT
Hi,
I don't think it's a bad idea, but could there be a more specific or
domain-related name for it?  Component(Base) is very generic, whereas
Appender(Skeleton) is more logging-domain-specific.

Yoav

--- Ceki Gülcü <ceki@qos.ch> wrote:

> 
> Anybody think it is a bad idea? If yes, any alternatives?
> 
> At 06:35 PM 1/3/2005, ceki@apache.org wrote:
> >ceki        2005/01/03 09:35:26
> >
> >   Modified:    src/java/org/apache/log4j AppenderSkeleton.java
> >                         Appender.java
> >   Added:       src/java/org/apache/log4j/spi Component.java
> >                         ComponentBase.java
> >   Log:
> >   - Log4j interfaces implement o.a.l.spi.Component and base classes 
> > extend ComponentBase. Started by changing the Appender interface and 
> > AppenderSkeleton class,
> >   other changes wil follow.
> >   --
> 
> Ceki Gülcü
> 
>    The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message