Mailing-List: contact log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Log4J Developers List" <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org>
Date: 28 Sep 2004 20:39:19 -0000
Message-ID: <20040928203919.10915.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org>
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: log4j-dev@logging.apache.org
Cc: 
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31458] New:  -
    DailyRollingFileAppender fails with mult load-balancing JVMs under WAS

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31458>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31458

DailyRollingFileAppender fails with mult load-balancing JVMs under WAS

           Summary: DailyRollingFileAppender fails with mult load-balancing
                    JVMs under WAS
           Product: Log4j
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Sun
        OS/Version: Solaris
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Other
         Component: Appender
        AssignedTo: log4j-dev@logging.apache.org
        ReportedBy: lisa.huber@fmr.com
                CC: lisa.huber@fmr.com


Regarding Bugzilla Bug 24107  
   "DailyRollingFileAppender sharing target File in multiple EARS" 

We are encountering this in a WebSphere clustered environment so that while we 
DO have 4 separate JVMs, they are cloned under WAS, which uses the multiple 
JVMs for load balancing.  This bug would indicate that if you are running in a 
load balanced environment with multiple servers, then the 
DailyRollingFileAppender will not work.

Thanks for your consideration in re-opening bug 24107 or looking into this 
variation of that bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org