Mailing-List: contact log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Log4J Developers List" <log4j-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
From: <mwomack@apache.org>
To: "Log4J Developers List" <log4j-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: RE: SocketReceiver & Listeners
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 07:30:33 -0700
Message-ID: <NEBBLPOOIKCGBKMCPNCGEEJEDHAA.mwomack@apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <7395B46C07F8D51182AE000629570CC4B2E0D8@IKE>

> Bear in mind that the sandbox has a modified SocketNode that
> Scott has done
> at the moment, I haven't done a diff, but if you're in that area, and can
> squeeze it into the 10 minutes, maybe evaluate whether the
> SocketNode change
> can be moved over into the core?  (or do we need log4j-dev vote approval?
> would make sense).

No vote; just a review and check in.  I have already started reviewing the
changes in the spi package.  Those look good to me.  I'll look at the net
package next.  I'll shoot for tonight to get some changes checked in.

-Mark


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org