logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Womack <mwom...@bevocal.com>
Subject RE: Adding more MDC support to several classes
Date Wed, 19 Mar 2003 21:39:17 GMT
> After reading the thread over a couple of times, could I summarise the
> feeling of the group, that the format:
> 
>          <log4j:mdc>
>             <log4j:data name="key1" value="val1"/>
>             <log4j:data name="key2" value="val2"/>
>             ...
>          </log4j:mdc>
> 
> would be acceptable to the group?  (along with valid 
> Transform.escapeTag
> stuff)
>
> The <log4j:data> element could/should/would also be a valid 
> sub-node of the
> <log4j:propertySet> node.  This seems like a good idea.  

+1

> Since I am
> unfamiliar with the propertySet stuff, could I suggest that that
> modification is a treated as a separate task after the MDC has been
> integrated? I'd rather not bite off too much right now, and 
> come back to it
> after MDC is working nicely.

+1

-Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message