Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-log4j-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 4396 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2003 00:12:09 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2003 00:12:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 27892 invoked by uid 97); 16 Feb 2003 00:13:48 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-log4j-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 27885 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2003 00:13:48 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2003 00:13:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 4142 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2003 00:12:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Log4J Developers List" Reply-To: "Log4J Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list log4j-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4131 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2003 00:12:07 -0000 Received: from lsne-catv-dhcp-43-104.urbanet.ch (HELO mail.qos.ch) (80.238.43.104) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2003 00:12:07 -0000 Received: from eitan.qos.ch (eitan [192.168.1.4]) by mail.qos.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FBF15E401 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 01:14:01 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030216011015.022b3328@mail.qos.ch> X-Sender: ceki@mail.qos.ch (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 01:12:20 +0100 To: "Log4J Developers List" From: Ceki =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FClc=FC?= Subject: Re: Log4J compiling requirements In-Reply-To: <1045344455.1424.7.camel@yarix.luix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Luis, Compilation tricks are a headache to maintain. Unless there is a compelling reason, the code should compile with JDK 1.2 not only 1.4. At 21:27 15.02.2003 +0000, you wrote: >Hi, > >I know that the running requirement for Log4J 1.2 is JDK 1.1, although >some parts of it only compile on JDK 1.2 (eg, LF5). > >Is it acceptable that minimum JDK for compilation is 1.4 although the >code can still run on 1.1 or 1.2 ? > >Thanks, >Luis -- Ceki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org