Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-log4j-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 25341 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2003 11:13:12 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2003 11:13:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 7372 invoked by uid 97); 3 Feb 2003 11:14:53 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-log4j-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 7365 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2003 11:14:52 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2003 11:14:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 25023 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2003 11:13:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Log4J Developers List" Reply-To: "Log4J Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list log4j-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 24987 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2003 11:13:08 -0000 Received: from lsne-catv-dhcp-43-155.urbanet.ch (HELO mail.qos.ch) (80.238.43.155) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2003 11:13:08 -0000 Received: from eitan.qos.ch (eitan [192.168.1.4]) by mail.qos.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC8515E40A for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:37:58 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030203121211.01a43af0@mail.qos.ch> X-Sender: ceki@mail.qos.ch (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 12:13:21 +0100 To: "Log4J Developers List" From: Ceki =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FClc=FC?= Subject: RE: Why would I use Log4J when Sun has a logging API? In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Actually, I don't. Although the book briefly discusses the topic, it does not dwell on the differences between JDK 1.4 logging and log4j. At 12:27 31.01.2003 -0500, you wrote: >Ceki's got a big write-up on that in his book... > >Ceki, would it be cool to post that? > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:Yoav.Shapira@mpi.com] >Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:07 AM >To: Log4J Developers List >Subject: RE: Why would I use Log4J when Sun has a logging API? > > >Howdy, >I've started working on it. Anyone feel free to contribute at any time >;) > >Yoav Shapira >Millennium ChemInformatics > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: mwomack@apache.org [mailto:mwomack@apache.org] > >Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 3:47 AM > >To: Log4J Developers List > >Subject: Why would I use Log4J when Sun has a logging API? > > > >Someone added this question to the wiki faq, but did not answer it. I > >assume they want an answer. Someone out there want to take a whack at >it? > > > >http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Log4JProjectPages/FrequentlyAs >kedQuestions > > > >-Mark > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > >For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org -- Ceki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org