Agree. The fastest way of doing something is not to do it all. (Like to think
that way regarding washing the dishes, cleaning the house, buy groceries...
;o) )
On Friday 04 October 2002 10:43, Bauman, Nick wrote:
> Damn decimal point cadswallop. On your bike, Nick! :) :) :)
>
> But the point remains "less is more". We opened up the doors one day on an
> app that was logging 13 pages per second. We got it down to something like
> 2 lines an hour. A lot more when things got wonky, as we needed it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:niclas@ewarna.com]
> Sent: Thu 10/3/2002 9:16 PM
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Proposed architecture changes to log4j for improved memory
> usage
>
>
> On Friday 04 October 2002 06:58, Bauman, Nick wrote:
>
> > Chris, your input is very helpful.
> >
> > You say that per day, you're logging ~1 GB. What is that, something
> > like, 1.15 MB per second? Isn't that too much?
>
>
> You just failed your 3rd grade math exam ;o)
>
> 1,000,000,000 per day / 24 hours = ~42 MB per hour
> ~42MB per hour / 3600 sec per hour = ~11kB per second.
>
> IMHO, not a h**l of lot of data. Many websites exceeds that by just
> taking down ~150 char per request.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands,
> e-mail: <mailto:log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
|