Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-log4j-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 66193 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2002 14:09:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 2002 14:09:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 18207 invoked by uid 97); 26 Sep 2002 14:09:44 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-log4j-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18191 invoked by uid 97); 26 Sep 2002 14:09:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Log4J Developers List" Reply-To: "Log4J Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list log4j-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18179 invoked by uid 98); 26 Sep 2002 14:09:43 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Message-ID: From: "Bauman, Nick" To: mwomack@apache.org, Log4J Developers List Cc: "Forsyth, Zachary" Subject: RE: Daemon Thread for AsyncAppender Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:08:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N That sure as hell would fix the problem. This is what caused me to investigate the issue further. I'll prepare the patch during my lunch break today. -----Original Message----- From: mwomack@apache.org [mailto:mwomack@apache.org] Sent: Thu 9/26/2002 12:41 AM To: Log4J Developers List Cc: Forsyth, Zachary; Bauman, Nick Subject: RE: Daemon Thread for AsyncAppender Nick, would this also solve log4j bug#9750? http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9750 I think we would be interested in your patch. Post it when you have a chance. -Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Bauman, Nick [mailto:nick_bauman@retek.com ] > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:07 AM > To: log4j-dev@jakarta.apache.org > Cc: Forsyth, Zachary > Subject: Daemon Thread for AsyncAppender > > > Would the log4j developers be interested in a patch to log4j that allows a > boolean mutator on AsynchAppender's constructor to have its Dispatcher > thread to be a daemon instead of a normal one? I find this feature very > useful for running a project in a commercial application server which does > not give me a way to call close() on AsynchAppender. > > Thanks for your time > > Nick Bauman > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: