Yes, I'd be willing to take it on. I'll try to get started on it tonight
and let you know if I run into anything unexpected.
-Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:ceki@qos.ch]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:25 AM
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: Re: Merging 1.2.X into the main branch
>
>
>
> I am busy with other things for the moment. Would you want to do it?
>
> At 22:52 25.09.2002 -0700, you wrote:
> >I don't mean to harp, but are we going to do this soon? I
> don't know if
> >Mike McAngus is still on this list, but we were waiting for
> a merge before
> >committing his changes. Maybe we should wait a bit longer.
> I know merging
> >is a pain.
> >
> >just wondering,
> >thanks,
> >-Mark
>
> --
> Ceki
>
> TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be
> conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from
> others. -- Jon Postel, RFC 793
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
|