logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Deacon Marcus" <deacon_mar...@wwtech.pl>
Subject RE: Revised log4j interfaces
Date Fri, 24 Aug 2001 20:13:34 GMT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:cgu@qos.ch]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:57 AM
> To: log4j-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Cc: donaldp@apache.org; mag@netstorm.net.au
> Subject: Revised log4j interfaces
> Hello,
> I have just started working on a revised log4j interface. An *early*
> draft of the proposal is available at:
> http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/proposal.html
> Your input is most welcome.

Just one small suggestion - if it makes just a little sense for something to
be an interface instead of an abstract class, in the long run it is almost
always better to make it an interface. If, under some conditions and/or JDK
versions, interfaces are noticeably slower, I'd consider it a design bug in
JDK and/or its JIT and assume they'd fix it in near future anyway.

> Ceki Gülcü - http://qos.ch

Greetings, deacon Marcus

To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

View raw message