This topic has died down a bit. My concern here is that I am pretty much read to do a release of Log4j 2 but I really don't know how to publish the web site. The process I use to build Log4j 2 is
1. Check it out from SVN.
2. Run "mvn -P release-notes generate-resources (then commit the generated notes for a real release).
3. Run "mvn -P apache-release install (this step would be replaced by mvn release:prepare release:package in a real release)
4. Run mvn site (would be on the tagged branch).
5. Run mvn site:stage-deploy or mvn site:deploy to deploy the site somewhere.
I'm not really sure where to go from here.
On May 2, 2012, at 2:11 AM, Ivan Habunek wrote:
I was away for a bit so I didn't comment earlier.
My idea is to generate the site using Twig , a nice PHP templating engine, in combination with Textile markup , which is much more versatile than most other common markup languages (such as markdown, apt, ...).
I have already converted the logging web site. The code can be found here:
And I have deployed the generated web for demo here:
This idea is obviously not compatible with the Apache CMS solution. Frankly, I would prefer this solution to the CMS since, from what I have seen, the CMS is quite a pain to use.
On 2 May 2012 10:44, Christian Grobmeier <firstname.lastname@example.org>
OK I understand svn externals is like "symlinks for svn". Sounds ok.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Ralph Goers <email@example.com
> On Apr 20, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> What i thought was, why not to clean it up? Your proposed solutions
> seem to be the cleanest way and updating everything just when we need
> an update to the main site feels somehow wrong
> Joe has now proposed using the CMS for the main Logging web site along
> with expaths.txt + svnpubsub for each sub-project. Each sub-project would
> then use svn externals so they could be independently managed. This sounds
> perfect to me.
I am a bit concerned on the CMS. Ivan has put much effort in the website design:
I will ask infra (on the ticket) if it is possible to either use that
design for the CMS or if we can bypass the CMS feature for this one