From general-return-1713-apmail-logging-general-archive=logging.apache.org@logging.apache.org Mon Feb 6 16:56:49 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B940E9AFA for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 16:56:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75642 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2012 16:56:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 75568 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2012 16:56:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: "Logging General" List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list general@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 75553 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2012 16:56:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:56:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ralph.goers@dslextreme.com designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.47] (HELO mail-pz0-f47.google.com) (209.85.210.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:56:38 +0000 Received: by daln34 with SMTP id n34so2680769dal.34 for ; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:56:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.240.135 with SMTP id wa7mr48936717pbc.7.1328547377461; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:56:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.64] (99-180-69-21.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net. [99.180.69.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q8sm17080726pbi.1.2012.02.06.08.56.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:56:16 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Log4J 2 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-8-200340409 From: Ralph Goers In-Reply-To: <87k4401g5v.fsf@v35516.1blu.de> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:56:14 -0800 Cc: Log4J Developers List Message-Id: <3D7193B6-1F8F-483D-918C-87DED73EC5D4@dslextreme.com> References: <69B35595-4446-4168-83D9-DA9BD21B4F85@dslextreme.com> <87k4401g5v.fsf@v35516.1blu.de> To: "Logging General" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-8-200340409 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:10 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2012-02-06, Ralph Goers wrote: >=20 >> As you may be aware I have been working on Log4j 2 for about 2 years >> now. It now consists of a fairly large body of code with fairly >> decent documentation. I feel it is ready to come out of my >> experimental branch and onto its own main branch where others will >> hopefully feel more inclined to participate. >=20 > For the benefit of the log4(X !=3D j) communities, can you give some = sort > of elevator pitch for log4j 2.0? What is different? Given that the > other projects around here have followed the 1.x model, it will be = good > to know what you considered good or bad of the "old" approach. >=20 > Don't hesitate to send me to some sort of overview document, I admit I > haven't looked for one, yet. You can find the latest documentation at = http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/log4j2/ Ralph= --Apple-Mail-8-200340409 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
On 2012-02-06, Ralph Goers wrote:

As you may be aware I have been working on Log4j 2 for = about 2 years
now.  It = now consists of a fairly large body of code with = fairly
decent documentation. I = feel it is ready to come out of my
experimental branch and onto its own main branch where = others will
hopefully feel = more inclined to participate.

For the benefit of the = log4(X !=3D j) communities, can you give some sort
of elevator pitch = for log4j 2.0?  What is different?  Given that the
other = projects around here have followed the 1.x model, it will be good
to = know what you considered good or bad of the "old" approach.

Don't = hesitate to send me to some sort of overview document, I admit = I
haven't looked for one, = yet.

You can find the latest = documentation at http://people.apache.org= /~rgoers/log4j2/

Ralph
= --Apple-Mail-8-200340409--