Return-Path: 
 <general-return-1684-apmail-logging-general-archive=logging.apache.org@logging.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1ACF477AC
	for <apmail-logging-general-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:48:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 47736 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2011 07:48:40 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@logging.apache.org
Received: (qmail 47667 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2011 07:48:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact general-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:general-help@logging.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:general@logging.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Logging General" <general@logging.apache.org>
List-Id: <general.logging.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list general@logging.apache.org
Received: (qmail 47657 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2011 07:48:40 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:48:40 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0
	tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,TVD_SUBJ_NUM_OBFU_MINFP
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [88.84.128.168] (HELO samaflost.de) (88.84.128.168)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:48:32 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by samaflost.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39CE28985D1;
	Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:48:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from samaflost.de ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (v35516.1blu.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id oIsU1vVJ6q1t; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:48:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by samaflost.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 694F328985D2; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:48:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org>
To: "Log4NET Dev" <log4net-dev@logging.apache.org>
Cc: Logging General <general@logging.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1
References: <87y5wyasmc.fsf@v35516.1blu.de> <87ehypdnjt.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>
	<39948F17-8D4A-49E6-9A43-3A69630315B1@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:48:11 +0200
In-Reply-To: <39948F17-8D4A-49E6-9A43-3A69630315B1@apache.org> (Curt Arnold's
	message of "Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:55:06 -0500")
Message-ID: <877h4dthhg.fsf@v35516.1blu.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 2011-10-10, Curt Arnold wrote:

> Has anyone compared how the new log4net.dll performs with the previous
> release's test suite?

I just did.  You have to tweak log4net 1.2.10's build file in the tests
directory to make it work with .NET 2.0 and explicitly run it with nant
-t:net-2.0 as 1.2.10 doesn't support any newer .NET framework.

I get two test failures from the 1.2.10 source bundle, both are known
issues with the tests on more modern versions of Windows (LOG4NET-310
and LOG4NET-265) and the tests have been fixed with 1.2.11.

Replacing 1.2.10's log4net.ddls I get one test failure less as one of
the two failures has been taken care of in code as well (LOG4NET-310).

In summary, all tests that passed in 1.2.10 still do with 1.2.11 and one
that fails on Windows Server 2003, Vista or newer now passes.  The only
remaining test failure is due to a problem with the test itself (a
timing issue).

Stefan

[1] Add

    <target name="runtests-net-2.0" description="Runs log4net tests on .NET Framework 2.0 version" depends="compile-net-2.0">
        <nunit2>
            <formatter type="Plain" />
            <test assemblyname="${current.bin.dir}/log4net.Tests.dll" />
        </nunit2>
    </target>