Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D00857BB8 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83820 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2011 14:23:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 83688 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2011 14:23:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: "Logging General" List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list general@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 83680 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2011 14:23:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:23:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of scott.deboy@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.175] (HELO mail-qy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.216.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:22:54 +0000 Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so2448665qyk.13 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:22:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date:cc; bh=7qLb68tziftWXY4VTmDGdFtayV4yyAD5NzIIPfWKuBk=; b=qgMXeMdJcGsQ4xjH2iKJKe/EchQ2jVeFl3mqR0s0MNnSUGtZ9p1UTsVvSM9uT5mRST QQNVSEu4JhAEYTqF2o1E51QfrZ8M7Cmas0a7sMj/nqldF2ZXeoYXIcmBkVEbXFIqxMpX LgeEVSUVcrknWRskbQQ4RkpWp/0Rq+V7jPWfg= Received: by 10.142.166.11 with SMTP id o11mr516033wfe.170.1313590953647; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.149] (c-67-171-171-29.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.171.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f8sm662629pbk.22.2011.08.17.07.22.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:22:32 -0700 (PDT) References: <87d3g41hyd.fsf@v35516.1blu.de> Message-Id: <7F2D0A4A-147A-4F1C-AA0A-A1D268C6B2AA@gmail.com> From: Scott Deboy To: Logging General In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7E18) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7E18) Subject: Re: Commit mailinglists Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:22:15 -0700 Cc: Logging General X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Aug 17, 2011, at 3:00 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> when I asked to publish the archives of the commits mailing lists it >> turned out that the various log4*-cvs lists don't really exist, mails >> actually go to the dev lists (with the exception of chainsaw which >> sends >> its commit mails here). > > ouch. Thanks for asking there > >> Before I ask infra to do the wrong thing, do you (do we) want to keep >> the commit mails on the dev lists or do we want to create real >> mailing >> lists for this? >> >> In the former case nothing needs to be done on the infrastructure >> side, >> only the config for chainsaw may need to be adapted. Otherwise we'd >> have a bunch of new mailing lists to be created. > > Good question. > > As there are not really tons of commits, is it more pragmatic to have > a single commits@logging.a.o > list for all products? We can split of as a project grows again. > > Drawback is of course that everybody gets all commit messages. Well > maybe, it is good actually and maybe there is a chance to fliter them > out. > > At the moment I prefer commits@ to keep oversight on all these small > projects > > Others? > > Cheers > >> >> Stefan >> > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de