logging-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Smith <psm...@aconex.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] log4cxx 0.10.0 release candidate
Date Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:23:11 GMT

On 23/02/2008, at 8:36 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:

> log4cxx 0.10.0 RC2 is now available for review for release on the  
> unofficial builds area.  This release candidate is strictly provided  
> for consideration for release, may be withdrawn and will be removed  
> from the publication location at the conclusion of the voting  
> period.  RC2 is currently available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/logging/log4cxx/0.10.0/apache-log4cxx-0.10.0-rc2.tar.gz
> MD5(apache-log4cxx-0.10.0-rc2.tar.gz)=  
> e50730742e18d3a72aa17ae1c2c673ce
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/logging/log4cxx/0.10.0/apache-log4cxx-0.10.0-rc2.zip
> MD5(apache-log4cxx-0.10.0-rc2.zip)= f8b4f9855a2088aa14654885cd9535f0
>

md5's match ok.

> The corresponding web content can be viewed directly from the  
> staging SVN:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/site/trunk/docs/log4cxx/index.html
>
Site looks good.


> The corresponding source is available at:
> svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4cxx/tags/v0_10_0- 
> rc2
>
Link works ok.

>
> Release will require at least 3 +1 votes from Logging Service PMC  
> members.  However, votes from other parties and any feedback or  
> experiences with the release candidate are greatly desired.  Given  
> the current makeup of the project, I would expect the PMC members  
> would verify the procedural and legal issues themselves (which is  
> their major responsibility on a release review) but would rely on  
> community feedback the content of the release.  It would be helpful  
> if you would report any observations, particularly successes or  
> failures building from the release candidate (compiler vendor and  
> version, platform, etc) along with your +1, 0 or -1.  PMC members  
> should identify their votes as binding.  I'd expect that PMC members  
> would hold their votes until there is some feedback from the user  
> community.  This will be a combined PMC and log4cxx-dev vote, a  
> separate PMC vote will not be called.


I've scanned the user mailing list and only seen one reply so far with  
comments.  I'm not sure I can validate the comment precisely to  
understand the significance of it.  I lean towards a +1 here, but will  
sit and lurk a day or so longer.

cheers,

Paul

Mime
View raw message