Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60228 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2007 21:12:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Feb 2007 21:12:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 45717 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2007 21:12:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 45681 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2007 21:12:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: "Logging General" List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list general@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 45660 invoked by uid 99); 13 Feb 2007 21:12:24 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:12:24 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.218.33.218] (HELO mail.qos.ch) (85.218.33.218) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:12:15 -0800 Received: from kal.qos.ch (kal [192.168.1.3]) by mail.qos.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F74D16A36B for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:11:54 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20070213220334.04396038@mail.qos.ch> X-Sender: ceki@mail.qos.ch (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:11:58 +0100 To: "Logging General" From: Ceki =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FClc=FC?= Subject: Re: [VOTE] graduate log4net In-Reply-To: <566A4D96-DB32-4E59-A09A-74A3CF055BC2@aconex.com> References: <6.0.0.22.0.20070213215524.04a37dd8@mail.qos.ch> <566A4D96-DB32-4E59-A09A-74A3CF055BC2@aconex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org At 10:00 PM 2/13/2007, Paul Smith wrote: >On 14/02/2007, at 7:58 AM, Ceki G=FClc=FC wrote: > >> >>It doesn't look like that the 3 independent committer requirement >>holds >>true for log4net. Nevertheless, I think the project deserves to >>graduate. > >I agree, but I think life in obscurity in the incubator isn't going >to improve it's chances of growing the community. Well, the incubator is not such an obscure place. Several other projects=20 have managed to develop large communities while sojourning in the=20 incubator. But as you say, log4net has demonstrated an ability to sustain a= =20 regular pace of development, so there is no point in refusing graduation. --=20 Ceki G=FClc=FC Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for= Java. http://logback.qos.ch