logging-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott Deboy" <sde...@comotivsystems.com>
Subject RE: [RESULT] Release log4j-1.3a8 official
Date Tue, 07 Feb 2006 20:11:09 GMT
I appreciate your efforts, Mark, and I realize this is an alpha release so the expectation
of a quality release is lower.  I don't want to get in the way of getting feedback.

My view is that releases (including alpha releases) shouldn't come to the PMC for a vote until
tests pass.  

Let's have a discussion about releases - do we as a PMC want to have a 'policy statement'
about tests and how they relate to releases?  If we don't want to define a set policy, that's
ok, it's just that -1s can have a negative impact (no pun intended) on the community, and
obviously if we can avoid it we'll be better off.

+1 on the release, but I'd like us to come to agreement on what our role is w/r/t releases
and tests/alpha and non-alpha releases.

Scott Deboy
111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950
Portland, OR  97201

Telephone:      503.224.7496
Cell:           503.997.1367
Fax:            503.222.0185



-----Original Message-----
From: mwomack@google.com on behalf of Mark Womack
Sent: Tue 2/7/2006 11:33 AM
To: Logging General
Subject: [RESULT] Release log4j-1.3a8 official
+1 Mark
+1 Curt
+0 Scott

There are not enough votes to allow the official release of log4j 1.3
alpha 8 at this time.

I am still looking into the file watchdog, but was still unable to
reproduce yesterday, using the JDK 1.4.  FYI, Gump has not reported
any test failures in any recent runs.


View raw message