logging-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Womack" <mwom...@apache.org>
Subject Re: CVS -> SVN Migration Status
Date Sat, 08 Oct 2005 03:37:32 GMT
Looks good to me.  I just have one question about the sandbox.  I had to
check out


to get the code.  Does this mean that each subproject will have a
"log4XYZ/trunk" and they will need to be checked out individually?  I can't
do a checkout of all the sandbox projects at one time?

If so, I guess that is ok.  I was thinking all the subprojects would share
one sandbox repository.  The thought being that cross-project experiments
would be easier to do in a single sandbox.  In practice I don't know how
likely that will be.

I am still go for the conversion.  We can muck around with sandbox later.

I will check back Saturday night for a status and will work to update the
site with the new repository info.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Henri Yandell" <bayard@apache.org>
To: "Mark Womack" <mwomack@apache.org>
Cc: "Logging General" <general@logging.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: CVS -> SVN Migration Status

> http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/logging/
> I repeated the migration, log4j-sandbox now found in 
> logging/sandbox/log4j, and the site now keeps its branches/tags.
> See how it looks, unless I hear otherwise I'll go ahead and do the real 
> migration at 8pm on Saturday US/Eastern.
> Hen
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Mark Womack wrote:
>> Henri, et al,
>> I believe we are good to go for the migration, with the following 
>> changes:
>> logging-sandbox : Move the existing cvs dirs into a "log4j" subdir.
>> logging-site : We need the branches and tags moved over from the cvs 
>> repo. Also, please double check the settings on this repo as I could only 
>> checkout using http, not https.  No one else seemed to have this issue, 
>> just me.
>> You had also previously mentioned something about a "core" repo yet to be 
>> converted.  I don't know what that one is.
>> Let us know what the next steps will be.  With the above, we are ready to 
>> go (finally).
>> much appreciated,
>> -Mark
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Womack" <mwomack@apache.org>
>> To: "Logging General" <general@logging.apache.org>; <bayard@apache.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 8:31 PM
>> Subject: CVS -> SVN Migration Status
>>> chainsaw - Build process verified (Scott)
>>> log4jcxx - Repository reviewed, still need to verify the build process 
>>> (Curt todo).
>>> log4j - Build process for the head and the 1_2branch verified for the 
>>> classes/jars.  Still need to verify the dist builds which are dependent 
>>> on the logging-site repository (see below). (Mark)
>>> log4net - Build process verified (Nicko)
>>> sandbox - Build process verified.  But when we move it for real we want 
>>> to move the current code into a sandbox/log4j subdir if we can.  If not, 
>>> then we'll just do it manually after the migration.  The sandbox will be 
>>> shared by all of the subprojects. (Mark)
>>> site - I still cannot check out the site.  Is anyone else encountering 
>>> this, or is it just me?  My cygwin svn command line client works fine 
>>> with all of the other repositories except for logging-site.  I'll try a 
>>> different client tomorrow evening.
>>> Thanks everyone.  With hurricane Rita bearing down on Curt's location we 
>>> may be delayed in completing the entire migration.  But we are almost 
>>> there and things are looking good (except for Rita, of course).
>>> -Mark

View raw message