Mailing-List: contact general-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Logging General" <general@logging.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <000801c5b672$99baa480$9d04fea9@hogwarts>
From: "Mark Womack" <mwomack@apache.org>
To: "Logging General" <general@logging.apache.org>,
	<bayard@apache.org>
Subject: Fw: Logging-Log4j -> SVN
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 18:46:03 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I sent this yesterday, but it does not look like it got through.

-Mark

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Womack" <mwomack@apache.org>
To: "Logging General" <general@logging.apache.org>; "Henri Yandell" 
<bayard@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN


>I have not gotten any indication that folks are going to be available 
>tomorrow besides Henri and myself.  I don't think we should approve the 
>migration until someone from each subproject reviews and approves.
>
> So, please spend some time this weekend reviewing the initial conversion 
> that Henri has performed and post feedback here.  We will finalize the 
> migration before the end of next week.
>
> [Henri, sorry if this seems to be taking longer than expected.  We'll get 
> it wrapped up quickly though]
>
> thanks,
> -Mark
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mark Womack" <mwomack@apache.org>
> To: "Logging General" <general@logging.apache.org>; "Henri Yandell" 
> <bayard@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 8:08 AM
> Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN
>
>
>> Should we set up some kind of Yahoo! IM Conference or an IRC chat channel 
>> for tomorrow?  I can set up a Yahoo! conference, but I don't know if 
>> everyone has a yahoo id.  I don't know how to set up an irc channel.  Who 
>> is going to be around?
>>
>> -Mark
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Mark Womack" <mwomack@apache.org>
>> To: "Henri Yandell" <bayard@apache.org>
>> Cc: "Logging General" <general@logging.apache.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 4:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN
>>
>>
>>> Hi Henri,
>>>
>>> We are planning to migrate all of the Logging Services projects to svn. 
>>> We'd like to target the timeframe of 9/10 for the project-wide 
>>> migration. Is that timeframe ok with you?  What are the things we need 
>>> to decide as part of the migration?
>>>
>>> One thing I was wondering in regards to the sandbox, should we have a 
>>> sandbox per project or maybe a top level sandbox that more people can 
>>> play in .
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> -Mark
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Henri Yandell" <bayard@apache.org>
>>> To: "Mark Womack" <mwomack@apache.org>
>>> Cc: "Shapira, Yoav" <Yoav.Shapira@mpi.com>
>>> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 5:59 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pinging again :)
>>>>
>>>> CVS-wise you've got:
>>>>
>>>> logging-chainsaw/
>>>> logging-log4cxx/
>>>> logging-log4j/
>>>> logging-log4j-attic/
>>>> logging-log4j-sandbox/
>>>> logging-log4net/
>>>> logging-log4php/
>>>> logging-site/
>>>>
>>>> Are they all still active?
>>>>
>>>> The obvious mapping to SVN would be:
>>>>
>>>> logging/
>>>>   chainsaw/
>>>>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>>>>   log4cxx/
>>>>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>>>>   log4j/
>>>>     attic/
>>>>     sandbox/
>>>>       trunk/ branches/ tags/
>>>>     proper/
>>>>       trunk/ branches/ tags/
>>>>   log4net/
>>>>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>>>>   log4php/
>>>>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>>>>   site/
>>>>
>>>> Only using 'proper' as the alternative to sandbox as that's what 
>>>> commons/taglibs uses.
>>>>
>>>> Hen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>