Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 9122 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2005 23:01:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2005 23:01:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 20429 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2005 23:01:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 20378 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2005 23:01:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: "Logging General" List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list general@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 20361 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2005 23:01:59 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 16:01:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.198.212] (HELO smtp113.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.198.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 16:02:12 -0700 Received: (qmail 6807 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2005 23:01:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hogwarts) (m-m-womack@sbcglobal.net@68.121.146.138 with login) by smtp113.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Sep 2005 23:01:56 -0000 Message-ID: <000801c5b1a4$a37f77c0$9d04fea9@hogwarts> From: "Mark Womack" To: "Henri Yandell" Cc: "Logging General" References: <000f01c57d3b$f6c5fc80$9d04fea9@hogwarts> Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:01:51 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Henri, We are planning to migrate all of the Logging Services projects to svn. We'd like to target the timeframe of 9/10 for the project-wide migration. Is that timeframe ok with you? What are the things we need to decide as part of the migration? One thing I was wondering in regards to the sandbox, should we have a sandbox per project or maybe a top level sandbox that more people can play in . thanks, -Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henri Yandell" To: "Mark Womack" Cc: "Shapira, Yoav" Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 5:59 PM Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN > > Pinging again :) > > CVS-wise you've got: > > logging-chainsaw/ > logging-log4cxx/ > logging-log4j/ > logging-log4j-attic/ > logging-log4j-sandbox/ > logging-log4net/ > logging-log4php/ > logging-site/ > > Are they all still active? > > The obvious mapping to SVN would be: > > logging/ > chainsaw/ > trunk/ branches/ tags/ > log4cxx/ > trunk/ branches/ tags/ > log4j/ > attic/ > sandbox/ > trunk/ branches/ tags/ > proper/ > trunk/ branches/ tags/ > log4net/ > trunk/ branches/ tags/ > log4php/ > trunk/ branches/ tags/ > site/ > > Only using 'proper' as the alternative to sandbox as that's what > commons/taglibs uses. > > Hen