From general-return-599-apmail-logging-general-archive=logging.apache.org@logging.apache.org Sun Sep 11 02:41:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 26940 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2005 02:41:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Sep 2005 02:41:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 82990 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2005 02:41:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 82946 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2005 02:41:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: "Logging General" List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list general@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 82933 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2005 02:41:49 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 19:41:49 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of nicko@neoworks.com designates 80.168.17.114 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.168.17.114] (HELO kronos.neoworks.co.uk) (80.168.17.114) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 19:42:00 -0700 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Subject: RE: Logging-Log4j -> SVN Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 03:44:00 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Logging-Log4j -> SVN Thread-Index: AcW1oottFfmonvGhSmuVuZPOb1HbxwA1vtvA From: "Nicko Cadell" To: "Logging General" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Mark, I have checked out the log4net SVN test repository from http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/logging/log4net and everything seems to be fine. All the files are there, the projects build, and the tests pass. >From log4net's point of view I am happy for the SVN migration to take place as in the test. The cvs2svn converter really does a nice job of grouping together related cvs checkins into single svn transactions. Hopefully we can get the migration done as quickly as possible. Cheers, Nicko > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Womack [mailto:mwomack@apache.org]=20 > Sent: 10 September 2005 01:54 > To: Logging General; Henri Yandell > Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN >=20 > I have not gotten any indication that folks are going to be=20 > available tomorrow besides Henri and myself. I don't think=20 > we should approve the migration until someone from each=20 > subproject reviews and approves. >=20 > So, please spend some time this weekend reviewing the initial=20 > conversion that Henri has performed and post feedback here. =20 > We will finalize the migration before the end of next week. >=20 > [Henri, sorry if this seems to be taking longer than=20 > expected. We'll get it wrapped up quickly though] >=20 > thanks, > -Mark >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Womack" > To: "Logging General" ; "Henri Yandell"=20 > > Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 8:08 AM > Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN >=20 >=20 > > Should we set up some kind of Yahoo! IM Conference or an=20 > IRC chat channel=20 > > for tomorrow? I can set up a Yahoo! conference, but I=20 > don't know if=20 > > everyone has a yahoo id. I don't know how to set up an irc=20 > channel. Who=20 > > is going to be around? > > > > -Mark > > > > ----- Original Message -----=20 > > From: "Mark Womack" > > To: "Henri Yandell" > > Cc: "Logging General" > > Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 4:01 PM > > Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN > > > > > >> Hi Henri, > >> > >> We are planning to migrate all of the Logging Services=20 > projects to svn.=20 > >> We'd like to target the timeframe of 9/10 for the=20 > project-wide migration.=20 > >> Is that timeframe ok with you? What are the things we=20 > need to decide as=20 > >> part of the migration? > >> > >> One thing I was wondering in regards to the sandbox,=20 > should we have a=20 > >> sandbox per project or maybe a top level sandbox that more=20 > people can=20 > >> play in . > >> > >> thanks, > >> -Mark > >> > >> ----- Original Message -----=20 > >> From: "Henri Yandell" > >> To: "Mark Womack" > >> Cc: "Shapira, Yoav" > >> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 5:59 PM > >> Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Pinging again :) > >>> > >>> CVS-wise you've got: > >>> > >>> logging-chainsaw/ > >>> logging-log4cxx/ > >>> logging-log4j/ > >>> logging-log4j-attic/ > >>> logging-log4j-sandbox/ > >>> logging-log4net/ > >>> logging-log4php/ > >>> logging-site/ > >>> > >>> Are they all still active? > >>> > >>> The obvious mapping to SVN would be: > >>> > >>> logging/ > >>> chainsaw/ > >>> trunk/ branches/ tags/ > >>> log4cxx/ > >>> trunk/ branches/ tags/ > >>> log4j/ > >>> attic/ > >>> sandbox/ > >>> trunk/ branches/ tags/ > >>> proper/ > >>> trunk/ branches/ tags/ > >>> log4net/ > >>> trunk/ branches/ tags/ > >>> log4php/ > >>> trunk/ branches/ tags/ > >>> site/ > >>> > >>> Only using 'proper' as the alternative to sandbox as that's what=20 > >>> commons/taglibs uses. > >>> > >>> Hen > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20