logging-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Womack" <mwom...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN
Date Sat, 10 Sep 2005 00:54:01 GMT
I have not gotten any indication that folks are going to be available 
tomorrow besides Henri and myself.  I don't think we should approve the 
migration until someone from each subproject reviews and approves.

So, please spend some time this weekend reviewing the initial conversion 
that Henri has performed and post feedback here.  We will finalize the 
migration before the end of next week.

[Henri, sorry if this seems to be taking longer than expected.  We'll get it 
wrapped up quickly though]

thanks,
-Mark

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Womack" <mwomack@apache.org>
To: "Logging General" <general@logging.apache.org>; "Henri Yandell" 
<bayard@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN


> Should we set up some kind of Yahoo! IM Conference or an IRC chat channel 
> for tomorrow?  I can set up a Yahoo! conference, but I don't know if 
> everyone has a yahoo id.  I don't know how to set up an irc channel.  Who 
> is going to be around?
>
> -Mark
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mark Womack" <mwomack@apache.org>
> To: "Henri Yandell" <bayard@apache.org>
> Cc: "Logging General" <general@logging.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 4:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN
>
>
>> Hi Henri,
>>
>> We are planning to migrate all of the Logging Services projects to svn. 
>> We'd like to target the timeframe of 9/10 for the project-wide migration. 
>> Is that timeframe ok with you?  What are the things we need to decide as 
>> part of the migration?
>>
>> One thing I was wondering in regards to the sandbox, should we have a 
>> sandbox per project or maybe a top level sandbox that more people can 
>> play in .
>>
>> thanks,
>> -Mark
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Henri Yandell" <bayard@apache.org>
>> To: "Mark Womack" <mwomack@apache.org>
>> Cc: "Shapira, Yoav" <Yoav.Shapira@mpi.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 5:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Pinging again :)
>>>
>>> CVS-wise you've got:
>>>
>>> logging-chainsaw/
>>> logging-log4cxx/
>>> logging-log4j/
>>> logging-log4j-attic/
>>> logging-log4j-sandbox/
>>> logging-log4net/
>>> logging-log4php/
>>> logging-site/
>>>
>>> Are they all still active?
>>>
>>> The obvious mapping to SVN would be:
>>>
>>> logging/
>>>   chainsaw/
>>>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>>>   log4cxx/
>>>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>>>   log4j/
>>>     attic/
>>>     sandbox/
>>>       trunk/ branches/ tags/
>>>     proper/
>>>       trunk/ branches/ tags/
>>>   log4net/
>>>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>>>   log4php/
>>>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>>>   site/
>>>
>>> Only using 'proper' as the alternative to sandbox as that's what 
>>> commons/taglibs uses.
>>>
>>> Hen
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> 



Mime
View raw message