logging-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Womack" <mwom...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN
Date Sun, 04 Sep 2005 23:01:51 GMT
Hi Henri,

We are planning to migrate all of the Logging Services projects to svn. 
We'd like to target the timeframe of 9/10 for the project-wide migration. 
Is that timeframe ok with you?  What are the things we need to decide as 
part of the migration?

One thing I was wondering in regards to the sandbox, should we have a 
sandbox per project or maybe a top level sandbox that more people can play 
in .

thanks,
-Mark

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Henri Yandell" <bayard@apache.org>
To: "Mark Womack" <mwomack@apache.org>
Cc: "Shapira, Yoav" <Yoav.Shapira@mpi.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN


>
> Pinging again :)
>
> CVS-wise you've got:
>
> logging-chainsaw/
> logging-log4cxx/
> logging-log4j/
> logging-log4j-attic/
> logging-log4j-sandbox/
> logging-log4net/
> logging-log4php/
> logging-site/
>
> Are they all still active?
>
> The obvious mapping to SVN would be:
>
> logging/
>   chainsaw/
>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>   log4cxx/
>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>   log4j/
>     attic/
>     sandbox/
>       trunk/ branches/ tags/
>     proper/
>       trunk/ branches/ tags/
>   log4net/
>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>   log4php/
>     trunk/ branches/ tags/
>   site/
>
> Only using 'proper' as the alternative to sandbox as that's what 
> commons/taglibs uses.
>
> Hen 



Mime
View raw message