logging-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Womack <wom...@adobe.com>
Subject RE: SVN Migration?
Date Wed, 20 Jul 2005 18:38:36 GMT
Here is a link I dug up.  I guess we should check with infrastructure to see
how up to date it is.

http://apache.org/dev/cvs2svn.html

-Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicko Cadell [mailto:nicko@neoworks.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 11:29 AM
> To: Logging General
> Subject: RE: SVN Migration?
> 
> I'm happy to do the necessary work for the log4net SVN migration,
> whatever that is.
> Do we have any guidance on the repository layout etc.. or do we just
> live with what infrastructure migrate for us and move things around
> afterwards?
> 
> Nicko
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Womack [mailto:womack@adobe.com]
> > Sent: 20 July 2005 17:41
> > To: 'Logging General'
> > Subject: RE: SVN Migration?
> >
> > I'm good with this.  The quicker, the better.  But all the
> > subprojects need to be ready and dedicated to do it in the
> > same timeframe.  I'm assuming Curt will be coordinating
> > log4cxx.  If we do it after log4j 1.2.12 release I can
> > coordinate it for log4j.  Nicko, will you be prepared for
> > log4net?  I need to check, but I don't see a repository for
> > log4php offhand.
> >
> > -Mark
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Curt Arnold [mailto:carnold@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 9:20 PM
> > > To: Logging General
> > > Subject: Re: SVN Migration?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jul 13, 2005, at 11:53 AM, Mark Womack wrote:
> > >
> > > > The PMC had decided that all of the LS subprojects would be
> > > > converted to Subversion for source control by July of
> > this year.  So
> > > > far, no projects have done the conversion.  Ceki started
> > the log4j
> > > > conversion, but it was stopped before it could be
> > affected, and no
> > > > one has volunteered to complete the task.
> > > >
> > > > Are any of the other subprojects looking into the conversion?
> > > > Anyone want
> > > > to be the sacrificial guinea pig?  :-)
> > > >
> > > > -Mark
> > >
> > > I think it may be better to do all the sub-projects at one
> > fell swoop.
> > > I don't think that having a "test" project would buy us much
> > > in reducing the overall disruption.   Infrastructure should have
> > > gotten pretty good at this by now.  I'd suggest that just after
> > > 1.2.12 is released, we switch all the sub-projects over to
> > Subversion.
> >
> >


Mime
View raw message