logging-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Womack <wom...@adobe.com>
Subject RE: Subversion Conversion
Date Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:14:30 GMT
OK, so a July 1st deadline sounds good.  Sub projects can coordinate their
conversion at their convenience around whatever project milestones they
might have.

We should continue to look at the GUI/IDE issues with Subversion.  I have to
believe that these are going to evolve.

Any other comments or concerns?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:ceki@qos.ch]
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 6:25 AM
> To: Logging General
> Subject: Re: Subversion Conversion
> At 06:30 AM 2/24/2005, Paul Smith wrote:
> >Does anyone know the driving reason behind the, err, eventual mandatory
> >conversion to SVN?  I know CVS has some limitations, but....  Is it just
> >easier on Infrastructure?  Security? Performance?  The reasons on the SVN
> >main page don't seem that compelling to me.
> No compelling reasons, I agree. However, as more and more projects move to
> SVN, infrastructure@ seems keen on pushing everyone to move to SVN in
> order
> to drop their support for CVS, which is quite understandable from their
> POV. End of this year has been floated around as a deadline. However, it's
> not yet an official deadline.
> I suggest we aim for the 1st of July for the move.
> --
> Ceki Gülcü
>    The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/

View raw message