Mailing-List: contact general-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Logging General" <general@logging.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.0.20041125100428.0395d400@mail.qos.ch>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:08:56 +0100
To: "Logging General" <general@logging.apache.org>
From: Ceki =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FClc=FC?= <ceki@qos.ch>
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Graduation of log4cxx and log4net
In-Reply-To: <3A0AD66E-3E67-11D9-BF3A-000393B97126@apache.org>
References: <3A0AD66E-3E67-11D9-BF3A-000393B97126@apache.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Curt,

The fact that log4cxx looks like it will survive its founder's (temporary)=
=20
departure is an excellent sign. I would emphasize this fact instead of=20
being shy about it.

Basing the upcoming 0.9.8 "snapshot" on APR is another good sign.


>>         =E2=97=A6     CVS module has been created
>
>Yes, though should we consider switching to SVN before graduating?

I believe it's your choice although the infrastructure@ folks seem to have=
=20
an inkling for SVN.

At 11:21 PM 11/24/2004, Curt Arnold wrote:
>It would be good to review whether the project's meet the exit criteria
>listed in
>http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/=20
>Incubation_Policy.html#Minimum+Exit+Requirements.  I'll take a stab for
>log4cxx:

[snip]

>>         =E2=97=A6     Destination PMC, or ASF Board for a TLP, has voted=
 for=20
>> final
>>acceptance
>
>I assume this is in progress

Yes, we will wait another day or so to allow everyone time to vote. I=20
believe only Mark's vote is missing?


--=20
Ceki G=FClc=FC

  The complete log4j manual:  http://qos.ch/eclm
  Professional log4j support: http://qos.ch/log4jSupport =20