Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27810 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2004 12:13:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2004 12:13:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 80213 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2004 12:13:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 80170 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2004 12:13:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: "Logging General" Delivered-To: mailing list general@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 80146 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2004 12:13:55 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.238.41.184] (HELO mail.qos.ch) (80.238.41.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 04:13:54 -0800 Received: from kal.qos.ch (kal [192.168.1.3]) by mail.qos.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEF41EC073; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:45:38 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.0.20041104125135.0389fcc0@mail.qos.ch> X-Sender: ceki@mail.qos.ch (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 13:14:16 +0100 To: "Log4CXX Dev" From: Ceki =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FClc=FC?= Subject: Re: Release Cc: general@logging.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4189E1B9.3020506@apache.org> References: <41891F2F.5070702@alphacent.com> <4189E1B9.3020506@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 09:00 AM 11/4/2004, Micha=EBl CATANZARITI wrote: >Hi, > >concerning the log4cxx release process : > >- First you should vote on the dev mailing list and report the vote result= =20 >to pmc@logging.apache.org The dev list for each sub-project of Logging Services decides by itself if and when it makes a new product release. In case of a positive decision, it needs to be approved by the Logging Services PMC as described in our (yet to be approved) bylaws [0]. This step is mostly a formality since the PMC will usually follow the recommendation of the sub-project committers. I'd also like to note that the PMC list is normally reserved for confidential discussions. In most cases, discussions pertaining to the Logging Services project should be held on the general@logging.apache.org mailing list. I consider the pmc@ mailing lists inconvenient because messages posted there automatically don an air of confidentiality. As such, they are not supposed to be forwarded elsewhere without the explicit and prior consent of the message's author. Votes, polls and such should also take place in general@. In short, avoid using pmc@, use general@ instead. [0] http://logging.apache.org/site/bylaws.html >- Please consult http://www.apache.org/dev/ for further official stuff. > >This is the non official release process : > >Release binary >=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D [cut] Nicely done. Thank you. --=20 Ceki G=FClc=FC For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual" http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/eclm/ =20