Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46613 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2004 13:50:22 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2004 13:50:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 52594 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2004 13:50:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-logging-general-archive@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 52576 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2004 13:50:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: "Logging General" Delivered-To: mailing list general@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 52563 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2004 13:50:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.qos.ch) (80.238.40.12) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2004 13:50:18 -0000 Received: from kal.qos.ch (kal [192.168.1.3]) by mail.qos.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F93F1EC1CA for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:55:34 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.0.20040106143909.029941a8@mail.qos.ch> X-Sender: ceki@mail.qos.ch (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 14:50:23 +0100 To: "Logging General" From: Ceki =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FClc=FC?= Subject: RE: [VOTE] Granting committer status to log4net developers In-Reply-To: <7395B46C07F8D51182AE000629570CC4B2E427@ike.local.anstat.co m.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 07:13 AM 1/6/2004 +1100, Paul Smith wrote: >And here is mine: > >[X] +1, grant committer access to log4net developers with CLA >[ ] 0, I don't know/care >[ ] -1, no, that's a bad idea because... > >Speaking of CLA's, I sent mine in by snail mail what seems like ages ago, >but I am not sure if it has been received, the committers list via the >apache website does not have me in italics, but neither is Mark or Scott,= so >I am wondering if that is out of date, or snail mail really IS that slow. Jim maintains a file of singed CLAs which gets processed to output=20 http://search.apache.org/~jim/committers.html Here are some relevant entries from this file: ceki:Ceki Gulcu:ceki at qos dot ch:Signed CLA notinavail:Paul Jeffrey Smith:paul.smith at lawlex.com dot au:Signed CLA notinavail:Mark Dwayne Womack:markwomack at womacknet dot com:Signed CLA yoavs:Yoav Shapira:yoavs at computer dot org:Signed CLA I suspect the problem comes from the "notinavail" field for Paul and Mark.= =20 Ask Jim Jagielski (jim at apache dot org) what the "notinavail" entry means= =20 and whether he can correct it. It may be that he could not find out your=20 Unix user name... There are no entries for Scott Deboy nor Jacob Kjome. Scott, Jacob, have=20 you sent in your CLAs? >cheers, > >Paul Smith --=20 Ceki G=FClc=FC For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual" ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp =20