logging-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael CATANZARITI <mca...@free.fr>
Subject Re: Logging Services project at Apache
Date Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:57:48 GMT
Hello !

First of all, I'd like to ask an administrative question :
Have we only to sign a CLA or have we to sign also a software grant ?
If yes, I'm not sure of the meaning of the different fields to fill 
("Signed by", "print name", "title", "representing").
Can anybody help me ?

About the two C++ twin sisters projects log4cplus and log4cxx :

My aim, with creating log4cxx, was to integrate it in a project written 
in both C++ and Java languages. This project would use log4cxx in the 
C++ part and log4j in the Java part. From this requirement, other 
requirements appear :
- log4cxx should keep exactly the same APIs as in log4j in order to help 
and not disturb developers using C++ and Java in the same project.
- log4cxx configuration file syntax should me the same as in log4j to 
allow the user of the project to configure the log with only one config. 
file (XML or property file)
- As many as possible log4cxx appenders and layout should be compatible 
with the corresponding log4j appenders and layout, in order to log with 
the same format and to the same target. For instance, both 
XMLSocketAppenders should be able to log to the same SocketServer, both 
FileAppenders should be able to log to the same file, etc...

All these requirements are almost fulfilled in log4cxx (excepted the 
date format in the log4cxx PatternLayout which is not compatible with log4j)

Moreover, log4cxx base classes offer an instrospection model, which is 
used to allow developers to create custom appenders, layouts, loggers, 
and levels.

In conclusion, I am in favour to merge both projects, but all theses 
features should be kept in the resulting project !


Ceki Gülcü wrote:

> At 12:01 AM 12/19/2003 -0700, Tad E Smith wrote:
>> Ceki,
>> I'm interested, but I have to ask the question.  What does this mean 
>> to me?  It's not clear
>> to me what role would be and how much effort would be involved.  Not 
>> to mention any
>> code changes that would be required.
> Hi Tad,
> It would mean that log4cplus would become a sub-project of Apache
> Logging Services and be distributed under the Apache banner, the same
> way log4j is/will be part of Apache Logging Services.
> For this to happen, a few conditions must be met.
> 1) All authors of the project code base must agree to sign a CLA. See
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla.txt for a copy of the CLA.
> 2) To ensure that the well functioning of the incoming sub-project,
> the new sub-project will undergo an incubation process. The process is
> described at
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html.
> I have not received the OK of the Board of Directors to incubate
> incoming sub-projects as part of Logging Services instead of the
> Incubator Project (http://incubator.apache.org) but hope to receive it
> shortly.
> The process might look complicated but if the project runs as a
> meritocracy, then there shouldn't be any real problems.
> In case of C++, there seem to be two projects interested in joining
> Logging Services: log4cplus and log4cxx. Any constructive ideas to
> accommodate both projects? Tad? Michael?
> As for the effort of migration, it could be estimated at two days, tops.

View raw message