logging-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ggreg...@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r1364432 - /logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/message/Message.java
Date Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:43:33 GMT
Author: ggregory
Date: Sun Jul 22 20:43:33 2012
New Revision: 1364432

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1364432&view=rev
Fix typo in Javadoc.


Modified: logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/message/Message.java
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/message/Message.java?rev=1364432&r1=1364431&r2=1364432&view=diff
--- logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/message/Message.java
+++ logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/message/Message.java
Sun Jul 22 20:43:33 2012
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ public interface Message extends Seriali
      * @return The message format.
      * @doubt Do all messages have a format?  What syntax?  Using a Formatter object could
be cleaner.
      * (RG) In SimpleMessage the format is identical to the formatted message. In ParameterizedMessage
-     * StructuredDataMessage itis not. It is up to the Message implementer to determine what
+     * StructuredDataMessage it is not. It is up to the Message implementer to determine
what this
      * method will return. A Formatter is inappropriate as this is very specific to the Message
      * implementation so it isn't clear to me how having a Formatter separate from the Message
would be cleaner.

View raw message