logging-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bode...@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r1173142 - /logging/log4net/trunk/src/site/xdoc/release/faq.xml
Date Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:44:19 GMT
Author: bodewig
Date: Tue Sep 20 13:44:19 2011
New Revision: 1173142

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1173142&view=rev
Log:
You really, really, really don't want to use RollingFileAppender with multiple processes logging
to the same file

Modified:
    logging/log4net/trunk/src/site/xdoc/release/faq.xml

Modified: logging/log4net/trunk/src/site/xdoc/release/faq.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4net/trunk/src/site/xdoc/release/faq.xml?rev=1173142&r1=1173141&r2=1173142&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- logging/log4net/trunk/src/site/xdoc/release/faq.xml (original)
+++ logging/log4net/trunk/src/site/xdoc/release/faq.xml Tue Sep 20 13:44:19 2011
@@ -703,7 +703,11 @@ public class FastLogger
                       If you use <span
                       class="code">RollingFileAppender</span> things
                       become even worse as several process may try to
-                      start rolling the log file concurrently.
+                      start rolling the log file concurrently.  <span
+                      class="code">RollingFileAppender</span>
+                      completely ignores the locking model when
+                      rolling files, rolling files is simply not
+                      compatible with this scenario.
                     </p>
                     <p>
                         A better alternative is to have your processes



Mime
View raw message