libcloud-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jerry Chen <>
Subject Re: [libcloud] libcloud roadmap and plans for the future
Date Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:00:15 GMT

On Feb 8, 2011, at 8:58 AM, Tomaz Muraus wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Schwartz, Philip Marc (LNG-BCT) <
>> wrote:
>> I would also vote -1 to twisted. But 0 to async. I am for async to a point
>> as long as it is setup as a per instance option for the user.
> Yes, that is how I have envisioned it. I probably should have explained it
> better in my original post.
> The change should be non-disruptive and the Twisted dependency should be
> optional (basically it would be totally up to the user if he wants to use
> async API or not).
> And like Paul has pointed out above, refactoring a library might not be a
> bad idea, since we will need to split and refactor some of the existing
> methods and this will make testing (among other things) easier.

All this being said -- Paul, where is your node.js port of Libcloud? ;)


View raw message