Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-libcloud-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 37809 invoked from network); 11 May 2010 20:38:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 May 2010 20:38:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 68347 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 20:38:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-libcloud-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68325 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2010 20:38:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libcloud-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: libcloud@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list libcloud@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68317 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2010 20:38:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 20:38:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of paul@querna.org designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.47] (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 20:38:35 +0000 Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1so1695520vws.6 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:38:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.25.203 with SMTP id a11mr4133597qac.104.1273610279231; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.239.205 with HTTP; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:37:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 13:37:58 -0700 Message-ID: From: Paul Querna To: libcloud@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [libcloud] 0.4.x goals I've bumped the version number on trunk to 0.4.0-dev, mostly because of the removal of zope.interfaces and the associated removal of libcloud.interfaces, at best removing a module, even if unused, is a big enough API change to warent a minor bump. So, I'm thinking that for 0.4.x, we shouldn't do a long cycle at all, I'd even like to consider tagging next week, and mostly just focus on fixing blocker issues with some drivers (voxel anyone?) and small updates to go along with the removal of zope.interfaces. I think we should try to make 0.4.x kind of a long lived stable release cycle, and do more creative stuff for 0.5.x. If nothing major happens then, I'll intend to tag 0.4.0 on something like next Wednesday the 19th? Thoughts? Thanks, Paul