Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lenya-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18092 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2009 14:36:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2009 14:36:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 84631 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 14:36:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lenya-dev-archive@lenya.apache.org Received: (qmail 84556 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2009 14:36:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lenya.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lenya.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lenya.apache.org Received: (qmail 84548 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2009 14:36:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:36:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [134.129.111.50] (HELO smtp1.NoDak.edu) (134.129.111.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:36:02 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.3] (dslstatic-236-64.ideaone.net [64.21.236.64]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.NoDak.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n66EZdkA019569 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:35:40 -0500 Message-ID: <4A520BB9.2020305@ndsu.edu> Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:35:37 -0500 From: Richard Frovarp User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@lenya.apache.org Subject: Re: Java 1.5 for 2.0.x branch? References: <4A51A231.4040703@wyona.com> In-Reply-To: <4A51A231.4040703@wyona.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Michael Wechner wrote: > > +1, but I think even if everyone says +1 you should give it some lead > time, for example 1 month, by saying > > [ANNOUNCEMENT] Switching to Java 1.5 by August 1st > > which means until then all code still needs to be 1.4 compatible and > hence gives those people who use 1.4 enough time > to switch to 1.5 on their platform. Not a bad idea. However, we would only be switching trunk. Those relying on 1.4 shouldn't running trunk in production. No one should be relying on trunk except devs. Richard --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lenya.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lenya.apache.org