labs-labs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE][LAZY] remove "lazy" from bylaws as it is incorrect
Date Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:11:02 GMT
On 12 June 2013 20:40, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:14 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Following on from the thread entitled
>>
>> "Is Labs using Consensus or Lazy Consensus?"
>>
>> I propose to remove the word "lazy" from the bylaws where it appears
>> as a qualifier to the descriptions of the voting process.
>>
>> This is not a change in the process, merely a clarification - or
>> rather, removal of a source of confusion.
>
> Umm, I believe that the original intention was that new labs would
> be subject to lazy approval.  You would probably have to look back
> in the archives to figure out the intent, if it matters whether this
> is a change to the process.

I see.

> I'd go further and suggest that there is no need for any kind of
> approval to open or shutter a specific lab, and that the primary
> purpose of the labs PMC is to simply prevent misuse of its
> sandbox/lists as a distribution area, but that is something the PMC
> can decide for itself.

In that case, I think it makes more sense to decide what voting
process we want (if any) before attempting to clarify the
documentation, and I'm therefore awarding this lazy vote a

-1

> ....Roy
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: labs-unsubscribe@labs.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: labs-help@labs.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: labs-unsubscribe@labs.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: labs-help@labs.apache.org


Mime
View raw message