labs-labs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Lab for distributed SCM?
Date Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:44:47 GMT
Mike Heath wrote:
> I have to respectfully disagree with Roy.  I understand a lot of his
> points but I don't see how today's dSCM tools and the Apache Way are
> mutually exclusive.  Yes, dSCM facilitates the "Linux Way" but dSCM does
> not mandate a decentralized process.  There are a lot of features
> available in today's dSCM tools that are completely orthogonal to any
> particular open source philosophy.
> 
> I use Git today.  I don't use Git because it implements "a fashionable
> concept" and I certainly don't use it because of Linus.  I use Git
> because it's an extremely powerful tool that does things that Subversion
> can't do.  Git gives me flexibility as a developer and helps me be more
> productive.
> 
> I use Git because with gitsvn it's a better Subversion client than svn.
>  With Git I can browse a file history offline and do diffs between
> revisions almost instantaneously.  I can create local branches that
> don't affect the central repository.  This makes it trivial to go back
> and forth between experimentation and real work.  I can commit changes
> to my local repository and revert a file back to a previous version if I
> need to.  These local commits do not affect the central repository but I
> still get the value of revision history.  Once my local changes are
> ready, I commit them to the central Subversion repository.
> 
> At work I sometimes use Git to collaborate on difficult and/or
> experimental changes with coworkers.  We can play with ideas without
> breaking the build and without creating a mess of branches in
> Subversion.  In this case, Git is used to facilitate collaboration.  Yes
> Git can be used to give each developer his own island but it can also be
> used to bring developers together and allow them to share ideas and
> innovate in different ways.
> 
> Is there room for abuse with dSCM?  Absolutely.  That's what makes this
> lab proposal such a good idea.  It provides a forum to discover how dSCM
> tools can best be used to complement the Apache Way and what aspects of
> dSCM should be avoided.
> 
> We should keep a centralized repository.  In fact, I don't see any
> reason to move away from the Subversion repository we have today.
> Subversion and dSCM can work together in a very complementary fashion.
> We should explore that.
> 
> IMO, this lab is an excellent idea and has the potential to foster a lot
> of innovation.  Thanks Jukka for propsing it.  I'm giving this lab a big
> (non-binding) +1.
> 
> I respect Roy a great deal and I'm sure his opinion will be weighed
> heavier than mine (this is a meritocracy) but I wanted to get my opinion
> out there.

I very much resonate with Mike.

I also wrote about this in the past

  http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/106/

I'm giving my (binding) +1 to this lab.

-- 
Stefano.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: labs-unsubscribe@labs.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: labs-help@labs.apache.org


Mime
View raw message