kylin-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Li Yang <liy...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Shall we define the base cuboid?
Date Thu, 23 Nov 2017 02:50:10 GMT
Don't think so. With only AGG2, the combination of [cal_dt, city, buyer_id]
is not computed at all.

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 1:59 PM, 杨浩 <yanghaogn@gmail.com> wrote:

> So, shall we change the document to delete the AGG1 , and says it is
> computed by default?
>
> 2017-11-20 8:55 GMT+08:00 ShaoFeng Shi <shaofengshi@apache.org>:
>
>> Yes, the base cuboid is the cuboid of all dimensions on rowkey. It is the
>> parent of all AGG.
>>
>> 2017-11-19 16:06 GMT+08:00 杨浩 <yanghaogn@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> As in the article http://kylin.apache.org/blog/2016/02/18/new-aggregat
>>> ion-group/ , two aggs are defined in the last. The AGG1 is base cuboid,
>>> shall we define it explicity? It seems the base cuboid is computed implicit
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Shaofeng Shi 史少锋
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message