Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-kylin-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-kylin-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAF4918C89 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 01:06:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18064 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2015 01:06:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-kylin-dev-archive@kylin.apache.org Received: (qmail 18012 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2015 01:06:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@kylin.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@kylin.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@kylin.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 18000 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2015 01:06:25 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 01:06:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A2416C298A for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 01:06:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.898 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.898 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81hnrKTGwM2Z for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 01:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com (mail-io0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B068143CD1 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 01:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iofz202 with SMTP id z202so4539875iof.2 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:06:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=BdZS3iuWvzBt21sX3Aho0vsJb9tAmQ4L4Is8UMBsyYE=; b=rwAmaIpxkSFMP7BZU8H7BOlchNoLaMMQd78XRLeYToFQfwIUFDPL/bnRW/2s4AE28C AwX97qljjWD9WiDVs5NmpttE4kYr5/QAIqmDtuRnKuewdEWnI59OjCAlxiiEtDL43yIe pMcClTu4UqGUSuLGObkIeBJgcTqDjvlY+LUo6lFiD/A32GZnCfo45CDeM+TA8S9+dmfO PIUr9QEHiWhLRGnbFFg/2Lil6COSNVGx7KMoIyV1c63jYq4VVzI/TrkGKBnAv6O6y/v3 U3h7fvAZFP3CntnhLE7kbYz9pvloGAVkAbvMGZjJquwJszWCsJty8PMCptGTtw9mMWjR BZMA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.4.83 with SMTP id 80mr27168939ioe.150.1446512783362; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:06:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.41.139 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:06:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 09:06:23 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] about cluster management From: Luke Han To: "dev@kylin.incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113edfac9d92620523988079 --001a113edfac9d92620523988079 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Run on YARN requires to run kylin on "one" Hadoop cluster. Based on today's practices, Kylin's services always sit beside clusters not inside to have capability to interactive with more than 2 clusters with just one Kylin deployment. Best Regards! --------------------- Luke Han On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Why dont we just leverage Hadoop YARN? > > We could use Apache Twill [1] to wrap it as YARN application. > > Helix is great but one of the limitations it could not provision new > node when not already available. > > [1] http://twill.incubator.apache.org/ > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:01 PM, =E5=91=A8=E5=8D=83=E6=98=8A wrote: > > Hi, all > > Kylin currently manages the cluster itself, so far it works fine > since > > there are only 2 roles for the cluster, job engine and query engine. > > In order to reduce the complexity of deployment and support the > coming > > streaming feature, I suggest kylin have a better cluster management. > > There are several candidates I think can be leveraged. Apache Heli= x > > seem suitable for Kylin in my opinion. > > I would love to start a discussion about cluster manager of Kylin, > how > > we can do it the better way, and which component we should choose. > --001a113edfac9d92620523988079--