kudu-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Question on performance of Kudu
Date Wed, 14 Sep 2016 23:29:57 GMT
In particular, TPCC requires transactions to be compliant, and we don't
have transactions, so it hasn't been a goal.

We should probably re-run the YCSB benchmarks at some point soon since
there have been lots of performance optimizations since 0.5, and I imagine
many of them would improve the results.

-Todd

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Roberta Marton <roberta.marton@esgyn.com>
wrote:

> Thanks
>
>
>
>     Roberta
>
>
>
> *From:* David Alves [mailto:davidralves@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 14, 2016 4:17 PM
> *To:* user@kudu.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Question on performance of Kudu
>
>
>
> Hi Roberta
>
>
>
>   We have some (old) ycsb numbers vs hbase on the kudu technical
> whitepaper: https://kudu.apache.org/kudu.pdf
>
>   We haven't ran any benchmarks recently though, and we never tried tpcc
> iirc.
>
>
>
> Best
>
> David
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Roberta Marton <roberta.marton@esgyn.com>
> wrote:
>
> Have you run any comparisons with Kudu using common benchmarks such as
> TPCC to see how Kudu compares against HBase and others?
>
> With your innovative design, these tests should show some good numbers.
>
>
>
>    Regards,
>
>    Roberta Marton
>
>
>



-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Mime
View raw message