karaf-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: Remote OSGi Performance Compared to Same JVM or Two JVM
Date Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:42:12 GMT
Cellar DOSGi does the same as CXF DOSGi without the overhead of 
SOAP/REST (directly using hazelcast NIO/serialization).

In the same JVM, you can increase the throughput with multiple 
consumer/thread on the same service. It's not really better performance, 
but more throughput.


On 08/27/2015 09:39 AM, hsinchen wrote:
> For a consumer bundle to access the provider bundle within a JVM, the
> performance should be better than the two standalone (consumer and provider)
> applications deployed in two JVMs with SOAP or REST. With DOSGi (Remote
> OSGi) by CXF, it goes with SOAP or REST, too. Then, the performance is the
> same just like the two standalone applications with SOAP or REST. Is it
> right? If yes, any of ways to get better performance near the same JVM.
> --
> View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Remote-OSGi-Performance-Compared-to-Same-JVM-or-Two-JVM-tp4042077.html
> Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Talend - http://www.talend.com

View raw message