Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-karaf-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-karaf-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBF8D17AC6 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92462 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2015 09:50:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-karaf-user-archive@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 92424 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2015 09:50:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@karaf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@karaf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 92414 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2015 09:50:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:50:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rhierlmeier@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.179] (HELO mail-we0-f179.google.com) (74.125.82.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:50:21 +0000 Received: by wesw62 with SMTP id w62so15141107wes.0 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:50:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qqyCTRznqoBYZqUVyCaOcEFlnZZpG4ILqEMb3Roksqs=; b=F8kodPQpUPERrrKmX07W5fTIN2barBOn+qMWGaL3fxmnrFhkVuqbeaAWxX1DdCLL0s MegSWCWDSeye+KiCu1PJCVqr71QpPJSYLunnxmmWO0qCiYOgw+DC8VllQJXhN8SPXgHT M0K9CKa8bHcy0wr+QOr/bjiq4ydFr8MVb5xhHNOjfF0U43O5LXDbHR+5ogJTzjcOeZXr 1QmUIHHbdFvEhx9L+u52LM1XexsyoXSgpxt2eoSKlApyhm3FfgRMIJrHmSC0ocmGCA8A a+2igOCSW4pgTi1voDLkY4K6WhOKDPqYd8UiPgsU3KmzSUXF2hm5kxbAoelOCHcbrQpl S5Xw== X-Received: by 10.180.85.70 with SMTP id f6mr73861932wiz.22.1426153819971; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.44] ([217.244.4.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ev7sm9175401wjb.47.2015.03.12.02.50.19 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:50:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Hierlmeier X-Google-Original-From: Richard Hierlmeier Message-ID: <55016153.1060307@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:50:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@karaf.apache.org Subject: Re: Use Jetty 9.x with Karaf 3.x References: <54D4F33B.6040507@linagora.com> <54D87C01.6040302@linagora.com> In-Reply-To: <54D87C01.6040302@linagora.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Vincent, I need also websocket support in karaf. Did you upgrade to karaf 4? What is your experience? Thank you Richard Am 09.02.2015 um 10:21 schrieb Vincent Zurczak: > Hi, > > My answers below. > > Le 06/02/2015 19:25, Achim Nierbeck a écrit : >> >> 3. An alternative could also be to support Pax-Web 4.x with Karaf 3.x. >> That would mean having the "standard" feature with Pax-Web 3.x and >> a "standard-4.x" with Pax-Web 4.x. If the name is not well-chosen, >> the idea is here. I do not know if it seems feasible with the >> package imports versions (there may be incompatible constraints). >> But if it is, I could try to help on this. >> >> >> nope, just to much work to maintain. And since this is done mostly on >> private basis ... just NO. :-)d. > > No problem, I understand. > > >> Le 06/02/2015 18:37, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : >>> short answer: Pax Web 4.x doesn't work in Karaf 3. >>> >>> Why not upgrading to Karaf 4 ? > > After thinking about it, I will wait for M2 and try it. :) > > Thanks, > > Vincent. > > -- > Vincent Zurczak > Linagora: www.linagora.com > > Twitter Vincent Zurczak @ LinkedIn > My Skype ID > My English blog