karaf-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Moquin <fragility...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: performance metrics blueprint vs. declarative services in karaf 3.0.x
Date Tue, 04 Mar 2014 15:50:39 GMT
What's the advantage in switching to DS in Karaf 4.x then?
On Mar 4, 2014 2:37 AM, "Achim Nierbeck" <bcanhome@googlemail.com> wrote:

> I don't think there are any awailable yet,
> and actually I don't expect there to be much of a difference.
> Both are basically doing the same thing.
> Blueprint does have an extender that will do the wiring for you,
> so there might be a "overhead" on the start of the bundle ...
> but I don't expect there to be an overhead later on, or at least not
> significant.
> DS is just a "convenience-wrapper" for standard OSGi technology.
> During build-time the BND or what ever will transform the annotations to
> Service-Trackers and Service Registrations.
>
> At the end it boils down to services and service-trackers that are
> "hidden" for the user, either by a xml syntax and an extender, or an
> annotation and a build time enhancement.
>
> regards, Achim
>
>
>
> 2014-03-03 22:55 GMT+01:00 asookazian2 <asookazian@gmail.com>:
>
>> Any info on perf metrics on DS vs. BP?  thx.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/performance-metrics-blueprint-vs-declarative-services-in-karaf-3-0-x-tp4032028.html
>> Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
> Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>
> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>
>

Mime
View raw message