Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-karaf-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-karaf-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EFA226C73 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87120 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2011 13:57:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-karaf-user-archive@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 86995 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2011 13:57:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@karaf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@karaf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 86987 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2011 13:57:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:57:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:57:03 +0000 Received: from ben.nabble.com ([192.168.236.152]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QlLeE-0002gr-5v for user@karaf.apache.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 06:56:42 -0700 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 06:56:42 -0700 (PDT) From: mst To: user@karaf.apache.org Message-ID: <7431AB8827AA7F4482AAFB01A4BD781B0145B5B1FBDF@VMSMail.rssystem.de> Subject: Service Wrapper License MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi! I'm new to Karaf and interested in running Karaf as (Windows) service. Maybe someone can confirm my analysis: The wrapper feature uses JSW from Tanuki software, version 3.2.3, as it's license is compatible to Apache 2.0. The license of the wrapper feature is not included in Karaf standard installation nor after installing the feature. There is no reference to the wrapper license in the NOTICE file. Shouldn't you deploy Tanukis license with Karaf? Shouldn't there be a reference in NOTICE? Is Karaf suitable for commercial purposes? Best Markus -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Service-Wrapper-License-tp3197537p3197537.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.