karaf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (KARAF-5274) update bundle list status for fragments attached vs not attached
Date Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:05:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16103184#comment-16103184

Jean-Baptiste Onofré commented on KARAF-5274:

So, basically, in {{bundle:list}} command, you are proposing to display {{Attached}} for the
fragments actually link to a host, and keep resolved for the "isolated" fragments (same in
the BundleMBean) ?

> update bundle list status for fragments attached vs not attached
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: KARAF-5274
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5274
>             Project: Karaf
>          Issue Type: Question
>          Components: karaf-shell
>            Reporter: Steven Spungin
>            Priority: Minor
>   Original Estimate: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0.5h
> I have a container with over 1000 bundles.  There are about 25 fragments as well.  I
understand that a fragment never has an active state.
> When I list my bundles, I scan to see if there are any issues.  I find it annoying that
the fragments are listed as Resolved.  I would rather see something like 'Attached'.  This
way I could grep the search results by resolved to find issues without having to see the fragments
mixed in.  Of course, if they are not attached to anything, I am OK with 'Resolved'.
> I am not suggesting to change the OSGi status, just word used in the list.  
> Another solution would be to add a boolean column that displayed an 'X' on not active
bundles and unattached fragments.
> I look forward to your feedback on this.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message