karaf-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (KARAF-4330) Instance script doesn't return correct PID number if root instance is started two times
Date Tue, 01 Mar 2016 10:19:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15173543#comment-15173543
] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on KARAF-4330:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 074b4fbbf423ce6cdef20a91435cb4dba02b4a9f in karaf's branch refs/heads/karaf-4.0.x from
[~ancosen]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=karaf.git;h=074b4fb ]

[KARAF-4349] Use the same approach of KARAF-4330 in karaf.bat script. A little fix.


> Instance script doesn't return correct PID number if root instance is started two times
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KARAF-4330
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4330
>             Project: Karaf
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: karaf-core
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.5, 4.0.4
>            Reporter: Andrea Cosentino
>            Assignee: Andrea Cosentino
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.1.0, 4.0.5
>
>
> Use case:
> - Run a first Karaf root instance 
> - Check the PID with instance script
> - Run a second Karaf root instance, the script will hang as expected
> - Check the PID with the instance script. The PID will be the one from the second instance
even if it's not started correctly and it's hanging.
> - Kill the second instance
> - Check the PID with the instance script. The PID is now 0 and the status is stopped,
but we have the first instance currently running.
> This is not a normal workflow, I see. Starting two times the root instance or two instances
with the same instance name is not correct, but anyway it's something we should consider to
manage.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message