Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-karaf-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-karaf-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1B4BFFA4 for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 06:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69178 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2013 06:53:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-karaf-issues-archive@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 69056 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2013 06:53:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@karaf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@karaf.apache.org Received: (qmail 68079 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2013 06:53:16 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 May 2013 06:53:16 +0000 Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 06:53:16 +0000 (UTC) From: "Achim Nierbeck (JIRA)" To: issues@karaf.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (KARAF-1017) Use the Pax Web features.xml for Pax Web 2.0 and further MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13650569#comment-13650569 ] Achim Nierbeck commented on KARAF-1017: --------------------------------------- It's already done for trunk. Just one more thing that crossed my mind. Is it better to have the pax-web repo in the features.xml or in the org.apache.karaf.features.cfg? For building custom Karaf Distribution it's probably better to have it in the features.xml. > Use the Pax Web features.xml for Pax Web 2.0 and further > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: KARAF-1017 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1017 > Project: Karaf > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: karaf-feature, karaf-webcontainer > Reporter: Achim Nierbeck > Assignee: Achim Nierbeck > Fix For: 3.0.0 > > > Right now the features for web and http are part of the std. karaf features. > I propose to use the features of pax web instead when upgrading to pax web 2.0 and Jetty 8 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira